Defining Groups: Proving Abelian Property

  • Thread starter Thread starter wubie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the abelian property of a group G, specifically addressing two parts of a mathematical question. Part (i) asks to prove that (xy)² = x²y² if and only if xy = yx, with hints provided on using group definitions. In part (ii), it is established that if g² = u (the identity element) for all g in G, then G is abelian, leading to the conclusion that xy = yx. Participants clarify how to apply the given information and definitions to arrive at the necessary proofs, enhancing their understanding of group properties. The thread concludes with a positive acknowledgment of the assistance received in grasping these concepts.
wubie
[SOLVED] Proof Using Def. of Groups

Hello,

This is my question:


Let G be a group.

i) Let x and y be elements of G. Prove that (xy)2 = x2y2 iff xy = yx. (Hint: Use the definition g2 = gg).

ii) Using part (i) prove that if g2 = u (the unit element) for all g which is an element of G, then G is abelian.


Now I BELIEVE that I have properly proved the part (i) of the question. But I am not sure how to proceed with part (ii). In fact, the second part question makes me wonder if I did part (i) correctly.

I know that the definition of abelian is:

For every x and y which are elements of G, a group G with the property x o y = y o x is called abelian ( or commutative). To rephrase, I would think this is the same as F(y,x) = F(x,y).

Now I am not sure what the definition would be in context of the question. Is the question saying,

Proposition: If g2 = u then xy = yx?

Is that the proposition that I am supposed to prove? And if that is the case, I am still not sure how to use the nfo g2 = u. How does it apply to the relation in part (i)?

In the case of part (i) would this be it?

x o y = x2y2. Then

x o u = x = u o x --> x2 * u = x = u * x2? (In which case 1 would be the identity element. Correct?).


Any help/clarification is appreciated. Thankyou.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by wubie
Proposition: If g2 = u then xy = yx?

Is that the proposition that I am supposed to prove?

Yes.

And if that is the case, I am still not sure how to use the nfo g2 = u. How does it apply to the relation in part (i)?

Consider the product fg, where f and g are both in G. Since the group is closed, fg is also in g. We then must have, according to the info they gave (gg=u):

(fg)(fg)=u

Right multiply by gf:

(fg)(fg)(gf)=u(gf)

Can you take it from there?

In the case of part (i) would this be it?

x o y = x2y2.

That should be (x o y)o(x o y)=(x o x)o(y o y).
 
Consider the product fg, where f and g are both in G.
Right. Then if f and g are elements of G then by definition of a group, f o g is an element of G.
We then must have, according to the info they gave (gg=u)
Where u is an element of G by definition of a group and also by the aforementioned property. Correct?
(fg)(fg)=u
Right multiply by gf:

(fg)(fg)(gf)=u(gf)

Can you take it from there?
Yes. I can see it now. Perhaps you did too much in this step.
That should be (x o y)o(x o y)=(x o x)o(y o y).
OH! That helps! It's like a composition function right? For instance,

q = F(y,x) = x * y and
G(q)= G (F(y,x)) = q * q = F(y,x) * F(y,x) = (x*y)*(x*y).

This would be the same for the right side of the equation yes?

I will be back later and post the proof.

Thankyou Tom.
 
Originally posted by wubie
Right. Then if f and g are elements of G then by definition of a group, f o g is an element of G.

Where u is an element of G by definition of a group and also by the aforementioned property. Correct?

Yes; the group must have an identity element.

OH! That helps! It's like a composition function right?


For instance,

q = F(y,x) = x * y and
G(q)= G (F(y,x)) = q * q = F(y,x) * F(y,x) = (x*y)*(x*y).

Right.

This would be the same for the right side of the equation yes?

In the language of your function F(x,y), you have:

F(x,y) o F(x,y)=F(x,x) o F(y,y)
 
In the language of your function F(x,y), you have:

F(x,y) o F(x,y)=F(x,x) o F(y,y)

Right.Right. My mistake. Thanks a lot Tom. Your help has been great increasing my understanding of the subject.

Cheers.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top