Proofs with current density and wavefunctions

Mary
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I was able to find a problem that was kind of similar to a homework problem that I am working on. Unfortunately, I'm not quite sure what is going on partially within the problem.

In the problem they state that \phi=\phi*, but it does not state why. I was wondering if someone could explain this to me?

Also, later on in the problem e^{-i\phi}e^{i\phi}+e^{i\phi}e^{-i\phi} cancels out along with the 1/2i. I'm not quite sure how this happened either. I have tried to review the euler's equation to understand where this comes from because I'm supposing it is being canceled out based on its properties.

I have attached the proof to this forum.


I would greatly appreciate some help because the problem I am working on involves proving that the integral of the current density over a surface is equal to the momentum operator/m. I understand conceptually what this means but I need a push in the write direction with the math behind it.
 

Attachments

  • proof.jpg
    proof.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 503
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be missing a factor of i when you plug back in. The i factors come from the \frac{\partial}{\partial x}.

Also,

e^{i\phi}e^{-i\phi} = e^{0} = 1.

This comes from the properties of exponentials, but you can show this using Euler's formula as well. Note \left(a + ib\right)\left(a-ib\right) = a^2 + b^2, and \sin\left(-\phi\right) = -\sin\phi.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top