Propagation velocity of transverse wave on a bar

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the propagation velocity of transverse waves in a long, thin rod, emphasizing the influence of material properties like shear modulus and density, as well as geometric factors such as the second moment of area (I). A shear wave equation is provided, indicating that the velocity is a material property, but participants note that the equation does not account for variations in geometry, which affect modal frequencies and propagation time. The need for an expression that incorporates different cross-sectional profiles is highlighted, particularly for applications involving hollow rods with varying wall thickness. The conversation underscores the complexity of adapting isotropic equations to accommodate these geometric influences. Overall, a comprehensive solution that integrates both material and geometric factors for wave propagation in rods remains sought after.
luckydog
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I need to know the propagation velocity of a transverse wave on a long thin bar or rod. In terms of material properties, such as E and density, and in terms of geometry such as I (2nd moment of area).

I'm a physics grad, so reasonably versed in such things. But can neither find nor derive an expression. So help appreciated.

Either an expression for propagation velocity, or some help in finding an expression for compliance per unit length, from which I can probably derive it.

Thx.

LD
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The elastic equation for a shear (transverse) wave in a solid medium is

\frac{1}{{{\beta ^2}}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{\theta _x}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} = {\nabla ^2}{\theta _x}

where

\beta = \frac{\mu }{\rho }

and

{\theta _x} is the one dimensional displacement

\mu is the shear modulus = modulus of rigidity

\rho is the density

t is, of course, time

This is independent of the shape of the object.

Hope this helps
 
Thanks studiot. Appreciated.

However, the application of that isotropic equation doesn't seem to fit well. In the case of a long thin rod, from published solutions for beam modal self resonance, transverse wave velocity appears to be dependant upon profile shape, ie second moment of area I. For example, two beams of equivalent mass/length but differing in I (say one is hollow but with larger radius), have different transverse modal self resonant fs for the same length. Therefore differ in propagation velocity. Presumably the compliance/length differs with I, and therefore profile ?

I was hoping for a solution that readily embraces differing area profiles. Presumably the isotropic equation can be adapted or applied, but I can't see how.
 
I'm not sure what you are looking for.

The velocity I offered is a material property. It is for the propagation of waves through the medium.

There are oscillatory modes available to rods, beams and other structural elements, by virtue of their shape, but this is a different thing. This is about vibration of the element as a whole.

The equation I posted is also a simple approximation. Depending upon your application there are effects noted which depend upon the application. For example concrete piles are long thin rods and commonly tested by shear wave pulses. There is some reference to this NDT method on the web.
 
Hi Studiot. Yes, thanks for posting the equation, it's correct and I understand it for isotropic solids. But the application I have requires to know the transverse pulse response propagation time in a long thin aluminium rod, with a circular cross section that could be hollow with a relatively thin wall. I wish to control the propagation time for a fixed length, by selecting material and radial geometry such as outer and inner radius.

The reason I mention vibration modal frequencies of beams is that i believe it illustrates how propagation velocity of a rod is also a function of radial profile (for a constant mass/length) as well as a function of material properties. Presumably, stiffness/length varies with I...

However the isotropic solid propagation equation seems not to readily accommodate variation due to various I values associated with different radial profiles. Or I can't see how to apply it so that it does.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top