A Propagator for traceless gauge field

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
I'm reading the ## \frac 1 N ## chapter of Sidney Coleman's "Aspects of Symmetry". Equation 3.5, gives the gluon propagator as below:
## A^a_{\mu b}(x)A^c_{\nu d}(y)=\left( \delta^a_d \delta^c_b-\frac 1 N \delta^a_b \delta^c_d \right) D_{\mu \nu}(x-y)##.
Then he explains that the term proportional to ## \frac 1 N ## is there because gluon field is traceless. But his notation is not standard and in the standard notation (## A^a_{\mu b}\to A_\mu=A^a_\mu T^a ##), the gluon propagator is ## -i\delta_{ab} D_{\mu\nu}##.
I want to know how can I get from the propagator in one notation to another because the latter propagator has no term in it that seem to come from the gauge fields being traceless.
Is it really because of the notation? Or is it something deeper?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shayan.J said:
I'm reading the ## \frac 1 N ## chapter of Sidney Coleman's "Aspects of Symmetry". Equation 3.5, gives the gluon propagator as below:
## A^a_{\mu b}(x)A^c_{\nu d}(y)=\left( \delta^a_d \delta^c_b-\frac 1 N \delta^a_b \delta^c_d \right) D_{\mu \nu}(x-y)##.
Then he explains that the term proportional to ## \frac 1 N ## is there because gluon field is traceless. But his notation is not standard and in the standard notation (## A^a_{\mu b}\to A_\mu=A^a_\mu T^a ##), the gluon propagator is ## -i\delta_{ab} D_{\mu\nu}##.
I want to know how can I get from the propagator in one notation to another because the latter propagator has no term in it that seem to come from the gauge fields being traceless.
Is it really because of the notation? Or is it something deeper?
Thanks

Pay attention to the indices: The fundamental representation indices a , b = 1, 2 , \cdots , N, and the adjoint representation indices A , B = 1 , 2 , \cdots , N^{2}-1. The gauge field (Hermitian, traceless) matrix, in any representation, is given by \mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) = A^{B}_{\mu}(x) T^{B} . The matrix elements of \mathbb{A}_{\mu} in the fundamental representation are, therefore, given by \left(\mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) \right)^{a}{}_{b} = A^{B}_{\mu}(x) (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} . So \langle \left(\mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) \right)^{a}{}_{b} \ \left(\mathbb{A}_{\nu}(y) \right)^{c}{}_{d} \rangle = \langle A^{B}_{\mu}(x) \ A^{C}_{\nu}(y) \rangle \ (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} (T^{C})^{c}{}_{d} . Using \langle A^{B}_{\mu}(x) \ A^{C}_{\nu}(y) \rangle \sim \delta^{BC} \mathcal{D}_{\mu\nu}(x - y) , you get \langle \left(\mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) \right)^{a}{}_{b} \ \left(\mathbb{A}_{\nu}(y) \right)^{c}{}_{d} \rangle \sim (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} \ (T^{B})^{c}{}_{d} \ \mathcal{D}_{\mu\nu}(x - y) .
The result follows from the SU(N)-identity (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} \ (T^{B})^{c}{}_{d} = \delta^{a}_{d}\delta^{c}_{b} - \frac{1}{N} \delta^{a}_{b}\delta^{c}_{d} , which I have derived some where on PF, with the normalization \mbox{Tr}(T^{A}T^{B}) = \delta^{AB}. You can always find the thing you need in one of my posts on PF :wink:.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ShayanJ, vanhees71 and dextercioby
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top