Proper acceleration of cyclotron particle.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hey! I've been working on a problem here for which I have found the four acceleration of a particle going in a circle with radius R to be

\underline{A} = -R\omega^2 \gamma^2 (0,\cos(\omega \gamma \tau), \sin(\omega \gamma \tau), 0)

and in going from this to find the proper acceleration I reasoned as follows: The four acceleration is valid in all inertial frames and in the instantaneous rest frame of the particle it self it will have a spatial four acceleration which is the proper acceleration of the particle, i.e

\underline{A} = (0, \vec a_0)
in the instantaneous particle. In this frame \gamma=1 so i reasoned that if i just sett \gamma=1 in the above expression I get the proper acceleration. I thus obtain

\vec a_0 = -\omega ^2 R(\cos(\omega \tau), \sin(\omega \tau),0)
which means that
a_0 = \omega^2 R.
but laboratory frame of the cyclotron
v = \omega R \ \ \ \ a = \frac{v^2}{R}
so that
a_0 = a
So this is clearly wrong.
However another line of reasoning would be to say that in the instantaneous rest frame of the particle
\underline{A} = (0, \vec a_0)
so the invariant norm is equal to

\vec a_0^2 = A_\mu A^\mu = (R\omega^2 \gamma^2)^2
such that
a_0 = R\omega^2 \gamma^2 = \gamma^2 a
Which is correct. So my question is, what is wrong about the first line of reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I spotted my error. The four acceleration is not valid in all inertial frames. One must transform it to another reference frame in order to use it there.
 
Last edited:
center o bass said:
I think I spotted by error. The four acceleration is not valid in all inertial frames. One must transform it to another reference frame in order to use it there.

Less than 5 minutes later you spotted your error? Ok.
 
dimension10 said:
Less than 5 minutes later you spotted your error? Ok.

Yes, I'm sorry. It is amazing how your subconsciousness works on the problem when you are trying to formulate it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top