Proper time elapsed between a photon being sent and received

Bailey2013
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem I am trying to solve is the proper time elapsed along A's worldline between a photon being emitted and sent to B (which is a distance L away from it along the x axis) and being reflected and detected by A again. The question is the second part of the question which I have attached. The variables for the question are best understood by reading the question itself.

Homework Equations


The metric for this question is shown in the tagged files.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used the fact that the photon's worldline is a null geodesic and therefore that the geodesic equation is just includes dt and dx (dy and dz are assumed to be constant as is seen on the question) and then tried to derive by integration the time of reflection, which I hope to then use to do the same to find the time when the photon comes back to A. However, I seem to not be getting towards the answer and so wondered if someone could tell me if my approach is right.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 21.06.01.png
    Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 21.06.01.png
    38.3 KB · Views: 630
  • Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 21.06.06.png
    Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 21.06.06.png
    42.2 KB · Views: 588
  • WhatsApp Image 2018-04-23 at 9.21.02 PM.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2018-04-23 at 9.21.02 PM.jpeg
    32.5 KB · Views: 628
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Bailey2013 said:
I have used the fact that the photon's worldline is a null geodesic and therefore that the geodesic equation is just includes dt and dx (dy and dz are assumed to be constant as is seen on the question)
I'm not sure what you mean by "dy and dz are assumed to remain constant". A photon cannot travel purely along the x-axis from A to B and still satisfy the condition of traveling on a null geodesic. The presence of the small quantity ##h(t, z)## in the line element requires the null geodesic from A to B to deviate from a straight line in the given coordinate system. So, you cannot assume that both ##dy## and ##dz## will be zero along the null geodesic. Without getting bogged down in details, you should be able to construct an argument for why ##dy^2## and ##dz^2## can nevertheless be neglected in the line element for this problem.

So, I believe your equation for the outward trip from A to B, which involves the integral from ##t = t_e## to ##t = t_r##, is OK. I would recommend writing a similar equation for the return trip. The two equations can then be combined into one equation involving a single integral over the time of the entire round trip. Then make approximations to first order in ##h##. I think it will work out and give you the desired expression.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top