Proprtionality Statement Graphing Procedures

  • Thread starter Thread starter nivekov123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on graphing procedures for a lab comparing pendulum frequency and length. The user has collected data and needs to graph it in both non-linear and linear formats, questioning whether to adjust the X-axis values. The correct proportionality statement is identified as frequency being proportional to the inverse square root of length. It is advised to plot frequency against the square root of length to achieve a linear relationship. The user also inquires about whether the axis titles should remain consistent across both graphs.
nivekov123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. I have finished a lab that compares the frequency at which a pendulum swings vs time in seconds. I have collected the date for both the length of the pendulum and the frequency. A question on the lab requires to graph the collected data before the statement (Non Linear Line) and then one after (Linear Line). However I do not know if I should redo the X-Axis and its values.



Homework Equations


For the Non-Linear Graph it is plotted with the y-axis as Frequency in Hz, and the X-axis as Length in (cm). After finding the correct proportionality statement, which is f is proportional to 1/√l where l is length and f is frequency.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have previously graphed with the X-axis just using the length values, but now that i have made the proportionality statement, what needs to be changed? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plot the frequency in terms of square-root of the length : you need to have points scattered around a straight line.

ehild
 
I have the increments properly placed, but should the titles of both axis be the same?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top