Protists vs. Sperm, Phagocytes: What's the Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
Sperm and phagocytes are specialized human cells and cannot be classified as protists. Protists are typically free-living organisms that can acquire or produce their own food, while human cells, including sperm and phagocytes, rely on the human body for sustenance and do not replicate or produce food independently. The term "protist" is becoming increasingly vague and may lose significance in the future, as it refers to a distinct classification of organisms separate from human cells. While sperm and phagocytes are alive, they are not autonomous organisms and do not meet the criteria to be considered protists.
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Just curious if things like sperm, phagocytes etc. were considered protists, and if not, what are they considered?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Protist are usually free living and can acquire or produces their food. It is a system be itself with the exception of some "multicellular" species.

Human cell could never be consider protist because most of the cells produce by the human body do not replicated and acquire, and produce food on their own. Stem cells and specific factor are require for these cells to exist. Food is always giving as simplified form rather than in the raw form encouter. The human cells are part of a system rather than being the system.
 
My guess is that this question will have no meaning within a decade. The word "protist" is extremely vague at this point and very nearly meaningless. At least that's been my experience learning taxonomy. Ian is the expert here.
 
Sperm, phagocytes, etc. are not different species, they are specialized cells produced by humans. Therefore, they cannot be considered protists. Protists refers to an entirely separate classification of organisms.
 
But they certainly are alive on their own, even if they are produced by cells inside a human and are kept alive by human bodily functions, what would they be considered if not protists?
 
They aren't alive on their own. They cannot reproduce.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom
Back
Top