Protons released from rest in a vacuum.

AI Thread Summary
Two protons released from rest in a vacuum, initially separated by 0.1 nanometers, will experience a changing force due to their mutual electrostatic repulsion. The problem requires calculating their relative positions after 10 seconds, which involves integrating the acceleration over time since the force varies with distance. Initial conditions indicate that at time zero, the acceleration is derived from Coulomb's law, resulting in a high initial acceleration that decreases as the protons move apart. The discussion emphasizes the need to establish a relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration through integration. Ultimately, the solution involves finding functions for velocity and position as functions of time.
mattkuk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If two protons start out at rest relative to each other, separated by 0.1 nanometers in vacuum, and then they are released, calculate their relative positions after 10 seconds.

Homework Equations



F = (kq^2)/r^2 = m*a

The Attempt at a Solution



I am fairly certain this needs to be solved using an integral since the force is constantly changing with the distance between the two protons, but I'm quite confused what it would have respect to. Time perhaps, ranging from 0 to 10 seconds and using a = dv/dt.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, we are assuming that the protons can be described classically, correct?

Second, what do we know about position (in this case r) and its relation to acceleration (a)?
 
Yes assuming a classically described proton. What is known about position in relation to acceleration is at time t = zero seconds, acceleration is equal to zero. At the instant the protons are released acceleration would be F/m which would be (k*q^2)/(m*r^2) where k = 8.89*10^9, q = 1.602*10^-19, m = 1.673*10^-27, and r = .1nm so a = 8.513*10^27 but as the protons become further apart the value of r increases, reducing F and therefor reduces the acceleration.
 
What I was trying to get at is dr/dt=v and dv/dt=a

Using initial conditions (r(0)=.1nm, v(0)=0, a(0)=kq^2/m(.1nm)^2), and after you have established the correct and useful coordinates, you should get a function of r in terms of a, or vice versa.
 
So using dr/dt=v and dv/dt=a and a=kq^2/mr^2 you could integrate a with respect to t twice to find v and then r in terms of a time t?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top