Prove a set X is union of disjoint equivalence classes

Ceci020
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove: If E1, · · · , Ek are the disjoint equivalence classes
determined by an equivalence relation R over a set X, then
(a) X = union of disjoint equivalence classes Ej
(b) R = union of disjoint (Ej x Ej)

Homework Equations


R is a subset of X x X

The Attempt at a Solution


For (a), my thoughts are :
1/ By reflexive property of equiv. relation, there exists an element a in X such that <a,a> belongs to R
2/ I know "E1, · · · , Ek are the disjoint equivalence classes
determined by an equivalence relation R", so if a belongs to R, then a must also belongs to some of the equivalence classes.
3/ Then I use the fact that a is in X, and a belongs to some of equivalence classes, then X must be the union of those equiv. classes

But then I'm not sure if my thoughts are correct, probably what I'm confused is with my 3rd idea.

For (b), my thoughts are:
Since R is a subset of X x X
and by (a), X is an union of disjoint equiv. classes
then X x X = union of (Ej x Ej)

And again, I feel shaky about my reasoning

Would someone please give me some hints or ideas?
I really appreciate your time and your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi:
You know an equivalence relation partitions your set into disjoint equivalence classes,right? If aRb and aRc, then bRa (symmetry) and aRc , so bRc (so b and c are in the same class) , so no element belongs to more than one equivalent class, and all elements belong to some class.

For (b), don't you mean R=EixEj , for Ei,Ej disjoint?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top