Prove Cauchy Sequence: {sn} from {tn}

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if the sequence {tn} is a Cauchy sequence, then the sequence {sn} is also a Cauchy sequence. The proof begins by applying the definition of a Cauchy sequence, establishing that for sufficiently large n and m, the difference |tn - tm| is less than a specified epsilon. It demonstrates that the sum of the absolute differences |an| + |an-1| + ... + |am+1| is bounded by epsilon, leading to the conclusion that |sn - sm| is also less than epsilon. The use of the triangle inequality reinforces this result, confirming that {sn} is indeed a Cauchy sequence. Overall, the proof is validated, and there is a request for assistance with LaTeX formatting for summation notation.
tink
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Let {an}(n goes from 1 to infinity) be a sequence. For each n define:
sn=Summation(j=1 to n) of aj
tn=Summation(j=1 to n) of the absolute value of aj.

Prove that if
{tn}(n goes from 1 to infinity)
is a Cauchy sequence, then so is
{sn}(n goes from 1 to infinity).


I started this proof with the definition of a Cauchy sequence. Pick an N large enough so that n,m>N makes
|an - am| < epsolon.
So if tn is Cauchy, we have
|tn-tm| < epsolon.
tn-tm = summation|an|-summation|am| = |an|+|an-1|+...+|am+1|
so now
|an| + |an-1| +...+ |am+1| < epsolon
but
|an + an-1 + ... + am+1| < |an|+|an-1|+...+|am+1|
by triangle inequality.
so now
|an + an-1 +...+ am+1| < epsolon
but
|an + an-1 + ... + am+1| = |sn - sm|
so now
|sn-sm| < epsolon, and therefore Cauchy.


Can anybody tell me if this makes sence? Or at least tell me how to write out "summation from n=1 to infinity" on here in symbols? Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a thread on \LaTeX somewhere around here...
s_n=\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_i

The proof looks ok too.
 
Thank you SOOO much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top