Prove Inequality for Natural Numbers: Q&A

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality involving the sums of cubes of natural numbers, specifically that 1^3 + 2^3 + ... + (n - 1)^3 < (1/4)n^4 < 1^3 + 2^3 + ... + n^3. The participant successfully reformulated the inequality using summation notation and confirmed its validity. They inquired about potential shortcuts for proving the inequality, expressing a desire to deepen their understanding of similar problems. An analytical approach was suggested, highlighting that the left-hand side represents a lower sum and the right-hand side an upper sum of the integral ∫_0^n x^3 dx. The discussion concludes by noting that equality cannot occur in this context.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, could someone please help me out with the following question?

Q. Prove that the following inequality holds for all natural numbers n and rewrite the inequality using summation notation.

1^3 + 2^3 + ... + \left( {n - 1} \right)^3 &lt; \frac{1}{4}n^4 &lt; 1^3 + 2^3 + ... + n^3

For the summation notation part I got: \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {\left( {k - 1} \right)^3 } &lt; \frac{1}{4}n^4 &lt; \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {k^3 }

I managed to prove that the inequality is true. However, there seems to be some sort of symmetry in the inequality. Is there a 'shortcut' to this question or does it need to be done the way that I did? That is, showing separately that the left and right parts of the inequality are true and then combining the results. I'd like to know partly because I want to enhance my understanding of questions of this type. Any ehlp appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to approach it analytically:
Notice that the left-hand side is a lower sum and the right-hand side is an upper sum of the integral
\int_0^{n}x^3 dx

This directly yields:

1^3 + 2^3 + ... + \left( {n - 1} \right)^3 \leq \frac{1}{4}n^4 \leq 1^3 + 2^3 + ... + n^3

It is not difficult to show that equality is not possible.
 
Thank you for your help Timbuqtu.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top