- 20,676
- 27,957
Looks nice at first sight. They say how to do it. Looks like a bit of work to check it. I'll go through it if I have some time. ##\theta'## has been my problem, too.Meden Agan said:
Looks nice at first sight. They say how to do it. Looks like a bit of work to check it. I'll go through it if I have some time. ##\theta'## has been my problem, too.Meden Agan said:
Sure. But if you differentiate ##\Theta(t) = \arcsin \left(\sqrt{E(t)}\right)## with respect to ##t##, you don't obtain the expression for ##\Theta'(t)## given by ##(3)##.fresh_42 said:Looks nice at first sight. They say how to do it. Looks like a bit of work to check it. I'll go through it if I have some time. ##\theta'## has been my problem, too.
Sadly, there's no context.Meden Agan said:
See post #26.robphy said:Sadly, there's no context.
Where did this integral arise?
What motivated the specific change of variables?
What characterizes the class of similar integrals solved by this method?
From what's presented, it seems it's "guess and check".
And if you do what he wrote, you won't obtain it either. ##(2)## results in a monster polynomial in ##t,## ##\sin\theta ## and ##\sin 2\theta.## To claim "one arrives at" seems a bit too optimistic to me. Where does the root come from? It looks as if he put all the trouble I had, and that prevented me from solving it, into these three words. Quite as if he calculated from behind and claimed what he needed to arrive at the correct number.Meden Agan said:Sure. But if you differentiate ##\Theta(t) = \arcsin \left(\sqrt{E(t)}\right)## with respect to ##t##, you don't obtain the expression for ##\Theta'(t)## given by ##(3)##.