Prove the energy eigenstates are degenerate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philethan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstates Energy
Philethan
Messages
34
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Two observables ##A_{1}## and ##A_{2}## which do not involve time explicitly, are known not to commute, ## [A_{1},A_{2}]\neq0, ##
yet we also know that ##A_{1}## and ##A_{2}## both commute with the Hamiltonian: ## [A_{1},H]=0\text{, }[A_{2},H]=0. ##
Prove that the energy eigenstates are, in general, degenerate. Are there exceptions? As an example, you may think of the central-force problem ##H=\textbf{p}^{2}/2m+V(r)##, with ##A_{1}\rightarrow L_{z}##, ##A_{2}\rightarrow L_{x}##.

Homework Equations


## [A_{1},A_{2}]\neq0, ##
## [A_{1},H]=0\text{, }[A_{2},H]=0. ##

The Attempt at a Solution



Please read my attached file. I type in latex. I really don't understand why I'm incorrect.

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about the eigenstates of two operators that commute?
What do you know about the eigenstates of two operators that do not commute?
 
  • Like
Likes Laura Manuela
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top