Prove the second inequality assuming the first

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://www.math.cornell.edu/~putnam/ineqs.pdf

Can someone give me a hint on problem 1?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You were already given a hint: prove the second inequality assuming the first. Second hint below:




















Isn't the expression

\left( \frac{ \frac{1}{a_1} + \cdots + \frac{1}{a_n} }{n} \right)^{-1}

already in a form to which the first inequality is applicable?
 
Last edited:
Yes. I read the problem. I spent 30 minutes manipulating both the first and the second inequality. Maybe I am missing something obvious, but I just don't see how to manipulate correctly. I tried logarithms, finding common denominators...
 
Bah, you saw it before I edited my post. :-p
 
Wow. I feel stupid now. :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top