Proving a linear algebra equation

IlyaMath
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble proving that two multivariate formulas are equivalent. I implemented them in MATLAB and numerically they appear to be equivalent.

I would appreciate any help on this.

Prove A = B


A = (Σπ^-1 + Σy^-1)^-1 * (Σπ^-1*π + Σy^-1*y)

y = π+ X*β

Σπ =τ*Σ

Σy = X' * Σβ * X + ΣεB = (Σπ^-1 + P'*Σβ^-1*P)^-1 * (Σπ^-1*π + P'*Σβ^-1*q)

q = P*y

P = (X'*Σ^-1*X)^-1*X'*Σ^-1Assumptions

i) Σε is infinitesimally small. (If Σε is exactly zero, then Σy may not be invertible).

ii) N > F (If N = F, then the proof is trivial. If N < F then is probably not invertible and P is not defined.)Notation

A, B: Nx1

π: Nx1

y: Nx1

q: Fx1

β: Fx1

Σ: NxN

Σπ: NxN

Σy: NxN

Σβ: FxF

Σε: NxN

X: NxF

P: FxN

τ: 1x1
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    314 bytes · Views: 551
  • upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    677 bytes · Views: 546
  • upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    481 bytes · Views: 506
  • upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    440 bytes · Views: 529
  • upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    786 bytes · Views: 530
  • upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    upload_2015-7-1_17-3-58.png
    337 bytes · Views: 539
Physics news on Phys.org
"Sigma", \Sigma, here, is a matrix, not a summation symbol?
 
Yes, HallsofIvy, you are correct...
 
This problem comes from Bayesian statistics, where N is number of observations and F is number of factors. All of the Sigma (Σ) are variance-covariance matrices. The Greek characters after each Σ are meant to be subscripts.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top