Proving a property of an integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike s
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Property
Mike s
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have already solved it, but I need confirmation:
etfcau.jpg


Are there other ways of proving this?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mike s said:
I have already solved it, but I need confirmation:
etfcau.jpg


Are there other ways of proving this?

Thanks in advance!

Your proof is fine (and it's the way I would've done it), except that you should explicitly define your F(a). You implicitly defined it as an indefinite integral, which means F(0) = c, but I would prefer to define F(a) = \int_0^a f(x) dx, and include one more intermediary step clarifying that \int_a^{2a} f(t) dt = \int_0^{2a} f(t) dt - \int_0^a f(t) dt = F(2a) - F(a). This way, I don't have to bother with the F(0) term at all.
 
Last edited:
Curious3141 said:
Your proof is fine (and it's the way I would've done it), except that you should explicitly define your F(a). You implicitly defined it as an indefinite integral, which means F(0) = c, but I would prefer to define F(a) = \int_0^a f(x) dx, and include one more intermediary step clarifying that \int_a^{2a} f(t) dt = \int_0^{2a} f(t) dt - \int_0^a f(t) dt = F(2a) - F(a). This way, I don't have to bother with the F(0) term at all.

Thanks a lot!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top