Proving an Inequality with Complex Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter mjordan2nd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If z and w are complex numbers such that |z|<=1 and |w|<=1 then prove

\left| z+w \right| \leq \left| 1 + \overline{z} w \right|

The Attempt at a Solution



I have reduced this to essentially

x^2+y^2 <= 1+(xy)^2.

It seems to me if both x and y are less than or equal to 1, then the inequality must hold. I can't think of how to prove this formally, though. Any help on how to do this would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so if x^2=a and y^2=b then you want to prove a+b<=1+ab, where 0<=a<=1 and 0<=b<=1. Write it as a*(1-b)+1*b<=1. If b is in [0,1] then the left side is a number between 'a' and '1', right? There's a name for this kind of inequality, but I forget what it is. There may also be an easier way to prove this. But I forget that too.
 
Maybe it's a form of a Jensen's inequality, in kind of a vague way.
 
Last edited:
Dick,

Thanks for your post. I am sorry, but I do not see how/why the following is true:

If b is in [0,1] then the left side is a number between 'a' and '1', right?
 
Suppose |\bar{z}| &lt; 1 then<br /> |w|^2 \le \frac{1-|z|^2}{1-|z|^2}<br /><br /> |w|^2-|\overline{z} w|^2 \le 1-|z|^2<br /><br /> |w|^2 + |z|^2 + 2\mbox{ Re}(\overline{z} w) \le 1 + |\overline{z} w|^2 + 2\mbox{ Re}(\overline{z} w)<br /><br /> \left| z+w \right|^2 \leq \left| 1 + \overline{z} w \right|^2<br />
 
Last edited:
mjordan2nd said:
Dick,

Thanks for your post. I am sorry, but I do not see how/why the following is true:

Can you show if t is in [0,1] then f(t)=a*t+b*(1-t) is between a and b? f(0)=b, f(1)=a and f(t) is a linear function.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top