Proving Another Vector Norm on C[0,1]

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtfitzpatrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm Vector
gtfitzpatrick
Messages
372
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



does the function <br /> \| \|: C[0,1] \rightarrow<br /> R defined by <br /> \|f \|= |f(1)- f(0)|<br /> define a norm on C[0,1]. if it does prove all axioms if not show axiom which fails

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't really understand the question. i know the 4 axioms of a norm but i don't know how to use the info given to prove or disprove them. is the question telling me that x has to be either 0 or 1 and y has to be either 0 or 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wait so its actually telling me its a straight line at y=1 between the points x=0 and x=1. so f(1) = 1 and f(0) = 1

so axiom 2 fails <br /> <br /> \|f \| = 0<br /> <br /> iff f = \vec 0 but <br /> <br /> \|f \|= |f(1)- f(0)| = |1- 1| = 0 <br /> <br />
 
Your words and reasoning seem garbled, but your counterexample is correct: \|f\| = |f(1) - f(0)| does not define a norm on C[0,1], because if f(x) = 1 is the constant function then \|f\| = |1 - 1| = 0 even though f \neq 0.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top