Proving Completeness of Continuous Basis Vectors

Aroldo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the vector space that consists of all possible linear combinations of the following functions: $$1, sin (x), cos (x), (sin (x))^{2}, (cos x)^{2}, sin (2x), cos (2x)$$ What is the dimension of this space? Exhibit a possible set of basis vectors, and demonstrate that it is complete.

Homework Equations


$$\sum_{n} |\phi_{n}\rangle \langle \phi_{n}| = 1 $$

The Attempt at a Solution



What is the dimension of this space?[/B]
By simple trigonometric relations, I found {{1, (cos (x))^{2}, sin (x), cos (x), sin (2x)}} spam the space. Therefore, dim = 5.

I am not sure about how to proceed from here.
Aren't the basis {{1, (cos (x))^{2}, sin (x), cos (x), sin (2x)}}?
How to demonstrate completeness of continuous bases?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not a continuous basis. It is a finite basis. Showing it is "complete" is the same as showing it is a basis (unless you are using some odd terminology).
 
  • Like
Likes Aroldo
The intent is probably to have you explicitly construct the identity operator and apply it to each of the given functions and show that the operator is indeed the identity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top