Proving Cyclic Decompositions: Let T be a Linear Operator on V

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bhatia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic
Bhatia
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let T be a linear operator on the the finite dimensional space V, and let R be the range of T.

(a) Prove that R has a complementary T-invariant subspace iff R is independent of the null space N of T.

(b) If R and N are independent, prove that, N is the unique T-invariant subspace complementary to R.

I supposed R has a complementary T - invariant subspace, say, W. Then , R should be T- admissible. I assumed to the contrary, that R intersection T is not equal to {0}. I took a point in the intersection but could not proceed further. Please suggest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you define "T-admisible"?
 
arkajad said:
Can you define "T-admisible"?

Thanks for your reply.

Given a linear operator T on a vector space V then a subspace W is T- admissible if

i) W is invariant under T
(ii) if f(T) β belongs to W, there exists a vector η in W such that f(T)β = f(T) η.
 
What is f(T) in (ii)?
 
Hint: Fix a basis for the range of T and extend it to a basis for V. What can you say about these extra basis vectors?
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top