Proving Entirety of conj(f(conj(z))) for an Entire Function f

tylerc1991
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that if a function f(z) = u(x,y) +iv(x,y) is entire, then the function conj(f(conj(z))) is entire.

Homework Equations



(i) The Cauchy-Riemann (CR) equations hold for functions that are entire: u_x = v_y and u_y = -v_x

(ii) conj(_) is the conjugate (i.e. there is a conjugate bar over f and over z)

The Attempt at a Solution



Since f is entire, CR is satisfied:
so u_x = v_y and u_y = -v_x

this implies:
u_x = -(-v_y) and -u_y = -(-v_x)

this implies:
CR is satisfied for a function g(z) = u(x,-y) - iv(x,-y)

but g(z) = conj(f(conj(z)))

this implies:
CR is satisfied for conj(f(conj(z)))

Since f is entire, the partial derivatives are continuous

this implies:
conj(f(conj(z))) is entire.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got the right idea. The presentation is a little confusing. Might be best if you say conj(f(conj(z))=u1(x,y)+i*v1(x,y) where u1(x,y)=u(x,-y) and v1(x,y)=(-v(x,-y)) and show u1 and v1 satisfy CR.
 
OK I can reword it. But there are no holes in the proof? Thank you very much for your help!
 
It's all there. I just have to read between the lines a bit to figure out u_x=(-(-v_y)) is important. Do rewrite with different symbols for the real and imaginary parts of conj(f(conj(z)).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top