Proving Equality of Supremum and Infimum for Bounded Sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chinnu
  • Start date Start date
Chinnu
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) Let A be bounded below, and define B = {b\inR : b is a lower bound for A}.
Show that sup(B) = inf(A).

(b) Use (a) to explain why there is no need to assert that the greatest lower bound exists as part of the Axiom of Completeness.

(c) Propose another way to use the Axiom of Completeness to prove that sets bounded below have greatest lower bounds.

Homework Equations



We can use the Axiom of Completeness, DeMorgan's Laws, etc...

The Attempt at a Solution



I have shown that both sup(B) and inf(A) exist.
I can see, logically, why they should be equal, but I can't seem to write it down clearly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must show two things:

1) sup(B) is a lower bound of A
2) If x is a lower bound of A, then x\leq \sup(B).

Let's start with the first. How would you show that for all a in A it holds that \sup(B)\leq a??
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top