Proving # Equilateral Triangles on Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter tainted
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere Triangles
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
tainted
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok, I have this problem this week. (1)
[tex] Consider\ a\ tiling\ of\ the\ unit\ sphere\ in\ \mathbb{R}^{3}\ by\ N\ equilateral\\<br /> triangles\ so\ that\ the\ triangles\ meet\ full\ edge\ to\ full\ edge\ (and\ vertex\ to\ vertex).\\<br /> Show\ that\ the\ only\ possibilities\ for\ N\ are\ N = 4,\ N = 8,\ or\ N = 20.[/tex]

Last week, we had the problem that follows (2)
[tex] Consider\ a\ tiling\ of\ the\ unit\ sphere\ in\ \mathbb{R}^{3}\ by\ equilateral\\<br /> triangles\ so\ that\ the\ triangles\ meet\ full\ edge\ to\ full\ edge\ (and\ vertex\ to\\<br /> vertex).\ Suppose\ n\ such\ triangles\ meet\ an\ one\ vertex.\ Show\ that\ the\ only\\<br /> possibilities\ for\ n\ are\ n = 3,\ n = 4,\ n = 5.[/tex]

Alright so my problem is that it seems to be nearly the exact same statement except (2) uses n while (1) uses N.

If that is true then wouldn't it be impossible to prove N can only be 4, 8, or 20 if I proved it was only 3, 4, or 5 last week.

Homework Equations


Area of each triangle = 3a - ∏

The Attempt at a Solution


Considering my question isn't for the solution rather than help understanding what it is saying/how this would be possible, I don't have any work yet.

If requested, I can show my answer to (2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Alright thanks man, that's all I needed, I got it!