Proving Fermion Occupation with Commutation Relations

  • Thread starter Thread starter commutator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermion
commutator
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

prove , using appropriate commutation relations that the number operator yields the values 0 and 1 for fermions , and any non - negative values for bosons.



Homework Equations

the commutation relations for bosons and fermions.



The Attempt at a Solution

the boson case is solved.
the fermions-i can understand this thing intuitively ,because on applying the number operator on a state containing n fermions in a single state , and then using commutation relation i am getting (-n) as eigenvalue which is absurd. but i do not know how to give a more compact proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is not precisely stated. The number operator for fermions can as well have eigenvalue 100 - can't you have 100 of electrons? Of course you can. Probably what you mean is the number of fermions in a given state. In that case you indeed use anticommutation relations, but you end up with the eigenstate being equal to its minus, not with the eigenvalue equal to its minus!
 
yes. i meant single state.
i have understood my mistake. thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top