Proving function is improper riemann integrable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pietjuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Riemann
Pietjuh
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



let f:[0,oo) -> R be given by f(x) = sin(x) / x for x>0 and f(0) = c. Prove that f is improper riemann integrable without computing the integral explicitly

The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted to find a upperbound for f(x) such that the integral does not diverge. The most simple one is to use the fact that sin(x) <= 1 for all x, but this gives a divergent integral.

I've already proved that f is Lebesgue measurable for every c in R. So I could turn the integral \int_0^R f(x) dx into a Lebesgue integral and then use one of the convergence theorems to try to show with them that the integral does not diverge. But I haven't succeded in doing this :(

Can anyone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you've probably noticed, the integral of the absolute value of your function diverges. The fact an improper integral can be defined means you must be able to show that the positive parts can be combined with the negative parts to get a partial cancellation that can converge. Draw a graph and think about estimating. Does that help?
 
Hoi Piet.

Use the Cauchy criterion!:
The improper integral \int_a^\infty f(x)dx converges if and only if \forall \epsilon&gt;0 \exists b&gt;a such that
c,d &gt; b \Rightarrow \left|\int_c^d f(x)dx \right| &lt; \epsilon

----
You can use integration by parts to show that:
\left| \int_c^d \frac{\sin x}{x}dx\right|\leq 2\left(\frac{1}{c}+\frac{1}{d}\right)
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top