Proving Injectivity: f ∘ g = f ∘ h ⇒ g = h

  • Thread starter Thread starter rallycar18
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of injective functions, specifically that if \( f \) is injective and \( f \circ g = f \circ h \), then it follows that \( g = h \). The participants are exploring the implications of the definitions and properties of injective functions in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of injective functions and their implications, questioning how the injectivity of \( f \) affects the relationship between \( g \) and \( h \). Some suggest considering the inverse of \( f \) and exploring the consequences of assuming \( g(w) \neq h(w) \) for some \( w \) in \( W \.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various approaches being considered, including direct reasoning and proof by contradiction. Participants are engaging with the definitions and exploring different angles without reaching a consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the properties of injective functions and their implications, with some participants expressing uncertainty about how to proceed from the definitions provided. The nature of the functions and their compositions is central to the discussion.

rallycar18
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Prove that:

If f : X → Y is injective, g, h : W → X, and f ∘ g = f ∘ h, then g = h.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your progress on this problem?
 
Tedjn said:
What is your progress on this problem?

Definition of injective for If f : X → Y :
For all y \in Y, there exists at most one x \in X such that f(x) = y

Because f : X → Y and g, h : W → X,

f ∘ g : W → X → Y and f ∘ h : W → X → Y

so f ∘ g, f ∘ h : W → Y


that's where I get stuck.
 
note that an injective function is a function that preserves distinctness... so you can consider the inverse of f
 
lanedance said:
note that an injective function is a function that preserves distinctness... so you can consider the inverse of f

Then f^(-1) : Y → X is also injective.. but I don't see what I can do from that.
 
It may be easier to see via contradiction. If there is w in W such that g(w) is not equal to h(w), what happens to (f ∘ g)(w) and (f ∘ h)(w)?
 
or if f o g = f o h, then apply f-1
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K