Proving Integral of Arcsech x using Integration by Parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter sooyong94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the integral of arcsech(x) from 4/5 to 1, specifically showing that it equals 2arctan(2) - π/2 - (4/5) ln(2). The subject area includes integration techniques, particularly integration by parts, and the properties of inverse hyperbolic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of integration by parts, with attempts to differentiate arcsech(x) and relate it to other trigonometric identities. Questions arise about how to transform the resulting expressions to match the desired form involving arctan.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the relationships between the angles and functions involved, particularly through the use of triangles and trigonometric identities. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to arrive at the same conclusion, with no explicit consensus yet on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the transformations and relationships between the angles, indicating potential gaps in understanding the underlying concepts. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the integral and the need for careful manipulation of trigonometric identities.

sooyong94
Messages
173
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I was asked to prove the integral

##\int_{\frac{4}{5}}^{1} \textrm{arcsech}(x) =2\arctan 2-\frac{\pi}{2}-\frac{4}{5} \ln 2##

Homework Equations


Integration by parts

The Attempt at a Solution


Let ##u=\textrm{arcsech} (x)##
##\textrm{sech u}=x##
##\textrm{cosh u}=\frac{1}{x}##
Differentiating implicitly,

##\textrm{sinh u} \frac{du}{dx}=\frac{-1}{x^{2}}##
##\frac{du}{dx}=\frac{-1}{x^{2}\textrm{sinh u}}##

Then I simplify it into
##\frac{-1}{x\sqrt{1-x^{2}}}##

Let ##\frac{dv}{dx}=1##

##v=x##

Using integration by parts and evaluating the integral, I got
##\frac{\pi}{2}-\sin^{-1} \frac{4}{5} -\frac{4}{5} \ln 2##

Which is numerically correct. But how do I obtain ##2\tan^{-1} 2 ## as shown in the question above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sooyong94 said:

Homework Statement


I was asked to prove the integral

##\int_{\frac{4}{5}}^{1} \textrm{arcsech}(x) =2\arctan 2-\frac{\pi}{2}-\frac{4}{5} \ln 2##

Homework Equations


Integration by parts

The Attempt at a Solution


Let ##u=\textrm{arcsech} (x)##
##\textrm{sech u}=x##
##\textrm{cosh u}=\frac{1}{x}##
Differentiating implicitly,

##\textrm{sinh u} \frac{du}{dx}=\frac{-1}{x^{2}}##
##\frac{du}{dx}=\frac{-1}{x^{2}\textrm{sinh u}}##

Then I simplify it into
##\frac{-1}{x\sqrt{1-x^{2}}}##

Let ##\frac{dv}{dx}=1##

##v=x##

Using integration by parts and evaluating the integral, I got
##\frac{\pi}{2}-\sin^{-1} \frac{4}{5} -\frac{4}{5} \ln 2##

Which is numerically correct. But how do I obtain ##2\tan^{-1} 2 ## as shown in the question above?

Draw the standard 3-4-5 right triangle. Observe that ##\frac{\pi}{2}-\sin^{-1} \frac{4}{5} = \tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4}##.

You now have to get ##\tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4}## into something with ##\tan^{-1}2## in it.

I found this a little tricky. The best solution I could find was to let:

##\tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4} = x## so ##\tan x = \frac{3}{4}##

Then let x = 2y so that ##\tan 2y = \frac{3}{4}##

Solve for y in the form ##y = \tan^{-1}z##, where z is something you have to find. Only one value is admissible. Express x as 2y = ##2\tan^{-1}z.##

Now observe that ##\frac{1 + \tan w}{1 - \tan w} = \tan(w + \frac{\pi}{4})##. Use that to find an alternative form for ##\tan^{-1}z##, which will allow you to find x, in the form you need.

There might be a simpler way (indeed, it might start with an alternative solution of the integral), but I can't immediately find one.
 
Last edited:
To show the answers are the same, you have to show ##2 \tan^{-1} 2 + \sin^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 5 = \pi##.

From a 3-4-5 triangle, ##\sin^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 5 = \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 3##.

From ##\tan^{-1}a + \tan^{-1}b = \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac{a+b}{1-ab}##,

##2 \tan^{-1} 2 = \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac {-4} 3 = \pi - \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 3##.

QED.
 
AlephZero said:
To show the answers are the same, you have to show ##2 \tan^{-1} 2 + \sin^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 5 = \pi##.

From a 3-4-5 triangle, ##\sin^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 5 = \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 3##.

From ##\tan^{-1}a + \tan^{-1}b = \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac{a+b}{1-ab}##,

##2 \tan^{-1} 2 = \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac {-4} 3 = \pi - \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 3##.

QED.

I don't get it, but why
##2 \tan^{-1} 2 = \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac {-4} 3 = \pi - \tan^{-1}\displaystyle\frac 4 3##.
 
I think the equalities should be $$2 \tan^{-1} 2 = \tan^{-1} \left(-\frac{4}{3}\right) + \pi = \pi - \tan^{-1} \left(\frac{4}{3}\right)$$

Using Alephzero's formula with ##a=b## gives $$\tan(\tan^{-1} 2 + \tan^{-1} 2) = -\frac{4}{3} \Rightarrow 2\tan^{-1} 2 = \tan^{-1} \left(-\frac{4}{3}\right) + \pi$$
 
Compare the graphs of ##\ y=\text{arcsech}(x) \ ## and ## y=\text{sech}(x)\ .##

Integrate ## y=\text{sech}(x)\ ## to get an area related to that given by integrating ##\ y=\text{arcsech}(x) \ .##

You will have to subtract the area of some rectangle.
 
SammyS said:
Compare the graphs of ##\ y=\text{arcsech}(x) \ ## and ## y=\text{sech}(x)\ .##

Integrate ## y=\text{sech}(x)\ ## to get an area related to that given by integrating ##\ y=\text{arcsech}(x) \ .##

You will have to subtract the area of some rectangle.

I plotted two graphs and yet I can't figure it out... :(
Capture.jpg
 
sooyong94 said:
I plotted two graphs and yet I can't figure it out... :(
attachment.php?attachmentid=70013&stc=1&d=1400850787.jpg

The definite integral you are evaluating represents the area below the y = arcsech(x) graph which is between x = 4/5 and x = 1 . Notice that arcsech(4/5) = ln(2) .

That is the same as the area below the y = sech(x) graph and above y = 4/5, for x ≥ 0. Right?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.jpg
    Capture.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 678

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K