msmith12
- 41
- 0
For a positive natural number n, we use
<br /> |n|= \log_{2}n<br />
as the measure of the size of n (which is the number of bits in n's binary representation). however, in most cases the size of n can be written as log n without giving an explicit base (the omitting case is the natural base e). Show that for any base b>1,
<br /> \log_{b}n<br />
provides a correct size measure for n, i.e., the statement "a polynomial in the size of n" remains invariant for any base b>1.
This was a problem in my homework for cryptography...
I understand the first part of the problem, which basically means that for any base, b:
<br /> \log_{b}n=|k| => b^{[k]+1} > n<br />
where [k] equals the floor of k.
but beyond that, I really have no idea...
thanks for any help
matt
<br /> |n|= \log_{2}n<br />
as the measure of the size of n (which is the number of bits in n's binary representation). however, in most cases the size of n can be written as log n without giving an explicit base (the omitting case is the natural base e). Show that for any base b>1,
<br /> \log_{b}n<br />
provides a correct size measure for n, i.e., the statement "a polynomial in the size of n" remains invariant for any base b>1.
This was a problem in my homework for cryptography...
I understand the first part of the problem, which basically means that for any base, b:
<br /> \log_{b}n=|k| => b^{[k]+1} > n<br />
where [k] equals the floor of k.
but beyond that, I really have no idea...
thanks for any help
matt