Proving Limit of f'(x) = 0 with MVT

  • Thread starter Thread starter sinClair
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Application Mvt
sinClair
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f be diff. on (0,infinity) If the limit of f'(x) as x->infinity and limit of f(n) as n->infinity both exist and are finite, prove limit of f'(x) as x->infinity is 0.

Homework Equations


Mean Value Theorem (applied below)

The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose a>0 and b>0. Then by mvt there exists c in (a,b) such that f'(c)=(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a).

Now taking the limit of both sides with respect to b as b->infinity, f'(c)=0 since the limit of f(n) as n->infinity is finite. Now, take the limit of both sides with respect to c as c->infinity and we have what we want?


Not sure if this does it or is clear because the presence of f(a) might turn limit into indeterminate form? But f(a), and a is finite so taking the limit of both sides still yields what we want. This seemed a little too "convenient"...


Thank you for looking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a isn't changing at all so f(a) is just some constant.
 
Yeah, so it's ok to take the limit of both sides twice with respect to different variables without something going wrong? So it's the limit of a limit or I guess taking one variable to infinity then another one at a time. Sorry this probably just sounds inane.
 
Last edited:
Well, instead of using the interval (a,b), try a neighborhood of b.

f'(c) = (f(b-e) - f(b+e))/2e

Take the limit as b goes to infinity. Since both f(b-e) and f(b+e) will go to the same limit, f'(c) = 0.
 
I think I see the problem: MVT itself shows that f'(c)=0 for some fixed c>0. But the problem asks to show that lim f'(x) as x-> infinity is 0.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top