Proving Linearity of Transformation: f as a Real Number

AI Thread Summary
To prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F, it is essential to demonstrate that it satisfies the properties of linearity. Specifically, T must fulfill T(a + b) = T(a) + T(b) and T(ca) = cT(a) for any polynomials a, b in P2 and real number c. The discussion confirms that T(p1 + p2) = T(p1) + T(p2) and T(cp1) = cT(p1), thus showing the required properties. It is clarified that f can be treated like a real number for the purpose of this proof, but it is not a real number itself. The conclusion affirms that the provided reasoning is sufficient to establish T as a linear transformation.
bifodus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let f: R --> R and let T: P2 --> F, and T(p) = p(f). Prove that T is a linear transformation.

P2 is the set of polynomials of degree 2 or less, and F is the set of all functions.

It seems to me that I can treat f as really just a real number, in which case it's no different from proving T(p) = p(x) for all x in R. Is it this simple?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can treat f similarly to a real number, because you can add and multiply real-valued functions, but you can't treat it as a real number.

Secondly, you're not trying to prove T(p) = p(f): that's the definition of T. You're trying to prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F.

Finally, F is is not just a set, it's a vector space.
 
To prove that T(p) is a linear transformation, you must show that it has the properties of a linear transformation, that is:
(a) T(a+b)=T(a)+T(b) for a,b in P2
(b) T(ca)=cT(a) for a in P2 and c in R
 
So let p1 and p2 be elements of P2
Then T(p1 + p2) = (p1 + p2)(f) = p1(f) + p2(f) = T(p1) + T(p2)
and T(cp1) = cp1(f) = cT(p1)

Is this sufficient to show that T is a linear transformation or am I leaving something out?
 
That looks right. Good job!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top