Proving Linearity of Transformation: f as a Real Number

AI Thread Summary
To prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F, it is essential to demonstrate that it satisfies the properties of linearity. Specifically, T must fulfill T(a + b) = T(a) + T(b) and T(ca) = cT(a) for any polynomials a, b in P2 and real number c. The discussion confirms that T(p1 + p2) = T(p1) + T(p2) and T(cp1) = cT(p1), thus showing the required properties. It is clarified that f can be treated like a real number for the purpose of this proof, but it is not a real number itself. The conclusion affirms that the provided reasoning is sufficient to establish T as a linear transformation.
bifodus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let f: R --> R and let T: P2 --> F, and T(p) = p(f). Prove that T is a linear transformation.

P2 is the set of polynomials of degree 2 or less, and F is the set of all functions.

It seems to me that I can treat f as really just a real number, in which case it's no different from proving T(p) = p(x) for all x in R. Is it this simple?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can treat f similarly to a real number, because you can add and multiply real-valued functions, but you can't treat it as a real number.

Secondly, you're not trying to prove T(p) = p(f): that's the definition of T. You're trying to prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F.

Finally, F is is not just a set, it's a vector space.
 
To prove that T(p) is a linear transformation, you must show that it has the properties of a linear transformation, that is:
(a) T(a+b)=T(a)+T(b) for a,b in P2
(b) T(ca)=cT(a) for a in P2 and c in R
 
So let p1 and p2 be elements of P2
Then T(p1 + p2) = (p1 + p2)(f) = p1(f) + p2(f) = T(p1) + T(p2)
and T(cp1) = cp1(f) = cT(p1)

Is this sufficient to show that T is a linear transformation or am I leaving something out?
 
That looks right. Good job!
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top