Proving Logarithm Identity for Nonzero Complex Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigplanet401
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The logarithm identity for nonzero complex numbers states that for any two nonzero complex numbers \( z_1 \) and \( z_2 \), the equation \( \text{Log } (z_1 z_2) = \text{Log } z_1 + \text{Log } z_2 + 2 N \pi i \) holds true, where \( N \) can be -1, 0, or 1. The principal branch of the logarithm is defined as \( \text{Log } z = \ln r + i \Theta \), with \( r > 0 \) and \( -\pi < \Theta < \pi \). The argument of the product \( z_1 z_2 \) may exceed the principal range, necessitating the addition of \( 2 N \pi i \) to bring it back into the correct interval. This ensures that the logarithmic identity remains valid across the defined range of arguments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions in the complex plane
  • Knowledge of the principal branch of logarithms
  • Basic grasp of the argument and modulus of complex numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the complex logarithm in detail
  • Learn about the argument function and its implications in complex analysis
  • Explore the concept of branch cuts in complex functions
  • Investigate the exponential form of complex numbers and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians working with logarithmic identities, and anyone studying the properties of complex numbers in advanced mathematics.

bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that, for any two nonzero complex numbers z_1 and z_2,
[tex] \text{Log } (z_1 z_2) = \text{Log } z_1 + \text{Log } z_2 + 2 N \pi i \, ,[/tex]

where N has one of the values -1, 0, 1.


Homework Equations



The logarithm on the principal branch is:
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> &\text{Log } z = \ln r + i \Theta \, ,\\<br /> \intertext{with}<br /> &r > 0 \text{ and } -\pi < \Theta < \pi \, .<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried writing z_1 z_2 as exp(log(z_1) + log(z_2)) and taking the log that way, and I ended up getting the result above, but with N being allowed to take on any integer value. Note that
[tex] \log z = \ln |z| + i \arg z[/tex]

in general.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the equation you have for log under "attempt at a solution," because that's really the relevant equation. And don't express z1z2 as exp(log(z1) + log(z2)), express it in the form reiq.
 
The point with the N=1,0,-1 business is that when you add two numbers in (-pi,pi), you might not get a number in (-pi,pi), although you will get one in (-2pi,2pi). So, since adding an integer multiple of 2pi to the arg doesn't affect the result, you can either add or subtract 2pi and get back in the necessary (-pi,pi) range.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K