Proving Non-Isomorphism: Subgroup and Dihedral Group of Equal Order

  • Thread starter Thread starter physix123
  • Start date Start date
physix123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
how would you go about showing that a subgroup and dihedral group- of the same order- are not isomorphic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Counterexample.
 
Sub group of WHAT? The "dihedral group" of a specified order is the reflection and rotations group of a polygon but you would have to say what subgroup, of what group you want to show is not isomorphic to that. I imagine there must exist SOME subgroup, of SOME group, that is isomorphic to a dihedral group. Did you mean to say, "show that a subgroup of a dihedral group cannot be isomorphic to another dihedral group"?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top