Proving that the Guassian Distribution integral converges to 1

nickclarson
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the integral of the Guassian Distribution converges to 1:

\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{- \frac{(x- \mu )^2}{2 \sigma ^2}} dx = 1

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



So I get that I can pull the constants out for the first step, but I have no clue where to go from there. I looked online for a solution and read about having to convert it to polar or something to solve it so now I am really confused. I thought it might work with a simple substitution, one that I just can't think of.

Any help greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's another double integral trick you can do, which is a little bit easier. When you have

I = \int dx e^{-x^2}
and
I^2 = \int dx \int dy e^{-x^2 - y^2}

do a substitution y = x s, dy = x ds.
 
So basically, it ends up like:

<br /> I^2 = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{\pi}} \int dx \int e^{- \frac{(x- \mu )^2}{2 \sigma ^2} - y^2} dy<br />

But now I'm having trouble with the substitution. Would my substitution look like this?

<br /> y = \frac{(x- \mu )}{2 \sigma} s<br />

<br /> dy = \frac{(x- \mu )}{2 \sigma} ds<br />

Then I get this:

<br /> I^2 = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{\pi}} \int dx \int \frac{(x- \mu )}{2 \sigma} e^{- \frac{(x- \mu )^2}{2 \sigma ^2} - (\frac{(x- \mu )}{2 \sigma} s)^2} ds<br />

I feel like I'm doing something horribly wrong and making it more complicated, pardon my ignorance. Thanks for your help so far though, I appreciate it.
 
To make it work since the constant is

\frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}}

I need the integral to equal

\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}

for it to equal 1
 
Get rid of all the constants first. Notice that you can shift x-mu to x since you're integrating over the entire real line, and then do a substitution to make exponential of the form e^(-x^2).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top