Proving the Convergence of Subsequential Limits: Solving for lim sup and lim inf

  • Thread starter Thread starter Conlan2218
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Limits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the limit supremum (lim sup) and limit infimum (lim inf) of a sequence \( s_n \) are elements of the set of all limits of convergent subsequences, denoted as SL(\( s_n \)). Participants agree that since the original sequence must be bounded for convergent subsequences to exist, the sup and inf must also be elements of SL(\( s_n \)). A key suggestion is to construct a subsequence that converges to the limit supremum, emphasizing the necessity of considering various cases in the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit supremum and limit infimum in sequences
  • Familiarity with the concept of convergent subsequences
  • Knowledge of bounded sequences in real analysis
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of limit supremum and limit infimum in detail
  • Learn how to construct convergent subsequences from bounded sequences
  • Explore examples of sequences and their subsequential limits
  • Review proof strategies in real analysis, particularly for sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, particularly those preparing for quizzes on sequences and limits, as well as educators looking for effective teaching methods for these concepts.

Conlan2218
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I missed the last class and I guess our teacher solved this problem and said it would be on our next quiz and I do not really understand how to do it.

Prove that

(i) lim sup sn is an element of SL(sn)
n to infinity

(ii) same thing but replace the sup with inf

Homework Equations



Homework Equations



lim sup:= limit supremum
lim inf:= limit infimum

The Attempt at a Solution

I know that it wants me to prove that the limit supremum of a sn is an element of the set of all limits of all convergent subsequences of the sequence sn. It makes sense that the sup and inf of the sequence would be would be elements of the set of all convergent subsequences because in order to have convergent subsequences the original sequence must be bounded. Thus, bounds would seem to be elements of the convergent, bounded subsequences.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try constructing a subsequence which converges to the limit supremum of a bounded sequence? You might need to consider a couple of cases, but it seems like it should be pretty straight forward.
 
I am having trouble showing that there must be a subsequence that converges to the sup any suggestions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K