Proving the existence of a bijection.

shoescreen
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I've recently used a property that seems perfectly valid, yet upon further scrutiny I could not come up with a way to prove it. Here is what I would like some help on.

Given two sets X and Y and functions f and g mapping X into Y, with the property that f is injective and g is surjective, prove there exists a bijection from X into Y.

I believe this has to be true for the following reason. Since bijections create an equivalence relation wrt cardinality, we can think of injections as saying Y is no smaller than X, and surjections as saying that Y is no bigger than X. Together we have that Y is is the same size as X, and hence they are equal cardinality. Therefore there exists a bijection between the two.

However, this heuristic argument aside, I can not think of a proof of this proposition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top