Proving the Falsehood of the Homomorphism Property for Ω:Zp^n→Zp^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bachelier
  • Start date Start date
Bachelier
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Define ##\Omega: \mathbb{Z_{p^n}} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z_{p^n}}## where ##p## is prime

with ##\ \ \ \ \ \ \Omega(x) = x^{p}##


I am trying to prove this is a ##Hom## under addition.

any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially just apply the binomial theorem. Since the ring has characteristic p all the undesired terms vanish.
 
The ring ##K## has order ##p^n## which makes it ##\cong \mathbb{Z_{p^n}}##
 
Last edited:
jgens said:
Essentially just apply the binomial theorem. Since the ring has characteristic p all the undesired terms vanish.

You did notice that the ring I am working with has ##p^n## elements. It is an extension field of ##\mathbb{Z_{p^n}}##.
 
Last edited:
Oh whoops you are right! Unless I am mistaken it turns out the result is actually false! Take p = n = 2 and consider the map Ω:Z4Z4 given by Ω(x) = x2. Then Ω(1+1) = Ω(2) = 22 = 0 but Ω(1)+Ω(1) = 12+12 = 2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jgens said:
Oh whoops you are right! Unless I am mistaken it turns out the result is actually false! Take p = n = 2 and consider the map Ω:Z4Z4 given by Ω(x) = x2. Then Ω(1+1) = Ω(2) = 22 = 0 but Ω(1)+Ω(1) = 12+12 = 2.

yes, even in the general case ##\Omega(1+1) = 2^p \neq 2 = \Omega(1) + \Omega(1) \ \forall n, p \geq 2##
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top