Proving the Gamma Function: Using Substitution and Integral Calculus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the integral of the function x^a(lnx)^b using substitution and integral calculus. The substitution x = e^-y transforms the integral, leading to a new expression that involves integration by parts. The user successfully applies integration by parts to simplify the integral further, ultimately substituting back to the original variables. The limits of integration are evaluated, confirming that the integral equals the proposed result. The proof concludes with the expression int(x^a(lnx)^b dx = (-1)^b/((1+a)^(b+1))*Gamma(b+1).
iceman
Hello, can anyone please me here?

I need to prove that

int(x^a(lnx)^b.dx= (-1)^b/((1+a)^b+1)*Gamma(b+1)

by making the substitution x=e^-y

this is what I have done so far:

x=e^-y -> y=-lnx

x=0 -> y=-(-00) =+00
x=1 -> y=0

dy/dx = -1/x -> dx=-xdy =-e^-ydy

then the integral becomes

int[e^(-ay)*(-y)^b*(-e^-y)dy, lower lim->+00, upper lim-> 0
= (-1)^b*int[e^-(a+1)y*y^bdy.

I then made a substituion t=(a+1)y
so integral becomes

(-1)^b*int[e^-t*y^bdy]

this is where I get a little bit lost...!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try the substitution with t again.
 


To continue, we can use integration by parts. Let u = y^b and dv = e^-t dt. Then du = b*y^(b-1) and v = -e^-t. The integral becomes:

(-1)^b*int[u*dv]
= (-1)^b*[u*v - int[v*du]] (integration by parts formula)
= (-1)^b*[y^b*(-e^-t) + b*int[e^-t*y^(b-1)]]
= (-1)^b*[y^b*(-e^-t) + b*u*(a+1)^(b-1)] (using the substitution t=(a+1)y)
= (-1)^b*[y^b*(-e^-t) + b*y^b*(a+1)^(b-1)]

Now, we can substitute back in our original variables to get:

(-1)^b*int[e^-t*y^bdy]
= (-1)^b*[y^b*(-e^-t) + b*y^b*(a+1)^(b-1)]
= (-1)^b*[x^b*e^-(-lnx) + b*x^b*(a+1)^(b-1)]
= (-1)^b*[x^b*x + b*x^b*(a+1)^(b-1)]
= (-1)^b*x^(b+1) + b*x^b*(a+1)^(b-1)

Finally, we can substitute in our limits of integration (0 and +00) to get:

(-1)^b*x^(b+1) + b*x^b*(a+1)^(b-1), lower lim->+00, upper lim-> 0
= (-1)^b*[+00^(b+1) + b*0^b*(a+1)^(b-1)]
= 0 - 0 = 0

Therefore, our final result is:

int(x^a(lnx)^b.dx= (-1)^b/((1+a)^b+1)*Gamma(b+1)

which proves the original statement. I hope this helps!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top