Proving the Gamma Matrix Identity in QFT: Is There a Mistake in My Attempt?

Catria
Messages
145
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Prove that \gamma^{a}\gamma^{b}\gamma^{c}\gamma^{d}\gamma^{e}\gamma_{a} = 2\left(\gamma^{e}\gamma^{b}\gamma^{c}\gamma^{d}+\gamma^{d}\gamma^{c} \gamma^{b}\gamma^{e}\right)

Each of the \gamma^{i}s are as used in the Dirac equation.

Homework Equations



\gamma^{a}\gamma^{b}\gamma^{c}\gamma^{d}\gamma_{a} = -2\gamma^{d}\gamma^{c}\gamma^{b}

\gamma^{a}\gamma^{b} + \gamma^{b}\gamma^{a} = 2g^{ab}

The Attempt at a Solution



\gamma^{a}\gamma^{b}\gamma^{c}\gamma^{d}\gamma^{e}\gamma_{a} = 2g^{ab}\gamma^{c}\gamma^{d}\gamma^{e}\gamma_{a} - \gamma^{b}\gamma^{a}\gamma^{c}\gamma^{d}\gamma^{e}\gamma_{a}

= 2\gamma^{c}\gamma^{d}\gamma^{e}\gamma^{b} + 2\gamma^{b}\gamma^{e}\gamma^{d}\gamma^{c}

Perhaps I mixed up something or there is a typo...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you wrote so far is correct. But, as you can see, it is not yet very close to what you want.

Instead, start over and try commuting ##\gamma^{e}## with ##\gamma_{a}##. To do this, you will need to use the identity obtained by lowering ##a## in the identity \gamma^{a}\gamma^{b} + \gamma^{b}\gamma^{a} = 2g^{ab}
 
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top