Proving the gravitational force of a solid sphere using integration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the gravitational force of a solid sphere using integration techniques. The key argument presented is that one cannot simplify the gravitational force of a uniformly distributed mass by assuming it acts as a point mass at the center of mass, particularly for a disc. The gravitational pull from a small mass element, represented by the equation dF = GmdM/x^2, must account for the distance from the point of interest, leading to an underestimation of the gravitational field when mass elements are not at the center. The conclusion emphasizes that the gravitational field contributions from mass elements are always less than if they were concentrated at the center of mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of gravitational field concepts
  • Basic principles of symmetry in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational fields for different geometries, focusing on solid spheres
  • Learn about the application of integration in calculating gravitational forces
  • Explore the concept of center of mass and its implications in gravitational physics
  • Investigate the differences between point mass approximations and distributed mass calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying gravitational forces, researchers in classical mechanics, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of gravitational field calculations.

Sam Jelly
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I am trying to calculate the gravitational force of mass m from a solid sphere with Radius R, mass M with uniform mass distribution. I am integrating the gravitaional force done by the thin circular plate. (I put mass m on top of every circular plate's center of mass). I know the solution to this is GmM/R^2, but my answer seems to be wrong. Is there any mistake? (mass m is on the surface of mass M)
Relevant Equations
dF = GmdM/r^2
D917654A-DC87-45BD-94A5-D8E816870D4B.png

This is my attempt at the solution. x from the equation dF = GmdM/x^2 represents the distance between the circular plate’s center of mass and mass m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It appears that you assume that the force between the plate and the mass ##m## is the same as if the mass ##dM## of the plate were in the center of the plate. Why would it be so?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
I assumed that mass dM was in the center of each plate because the mass is distributed uniformly therefore it will be at the center of mass.
 
Sam Jelly said:
I assumed that mass dM was in the center of each plate because the mass is distributed uniformly therefore it will be at the center of mass.
This is wrong.

Essentially you are making an assumption about the overall gravity of an object where you cannot replace it by a point mass in the CoM, but you want to show it for a sphere - for which you can.
 
Sam Jelly said:
I assumed that mass dM was in the center of each plate because the mass is distributed uniformly therefore it will be at the center of mass.
If that were assumed to be true in general, there would be no point in proving it for the special case of a sphere!
 
As for a simple argument to see that it is not the case for a disc:

Consider the gravitational pull of a small part of the disc ##dm##. As long as the volume it is contained in is small, the gravitational pull at the point of interest can be approximated by the point source formula
$$
d\vec g = \frac{G\, dm}{x^2+r^2} \vec e,
$$
where ##\vec e## is a unit vector pointing from the point of interest towards the mass element. Now, by symmetry, the final gravitational field ##\vec g## must point towards the center of the disc, but there are two effects that both come into play for any ##r > 0##:
  1. The denominator ##x^2 + r^2 > x^2## so the first factor is always smaller than it would be if the mass ##dm## was on the symmetry axis.
  2. The component of the unit vector ##\vec e## will be smaller than 1
Both effects mean that the contribution of the mass ##dm## is smaller than it would be if you had put it at the center of mass. Since all mass elements (except for the one at ##r = 0##) give smaller contributions to the gravitational field than they would if they were at the center of mass, the result of approximating the full mass of the disc to be at the center of mass must overestimate the actual gravitational field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hill and PeroK

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K