Proving the Limit of a Complicated Function using Variables and Compositions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hygelac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Variables
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the limit of a composed function as x approaches a specific value. The user presents the functions f, g, and h, and seeks to demonstrate that the limit of the composition h(g(f(x))) as x approaches a equals d. By substituting f(a) with b, the user simplifies the limit to h(g(b)), ultimately showing that it equals d through the established relationships between the variables. The reasoning is confirmed to be sound, though caution is advised regarding the level of detail expected by the instructor. Overall, the approach effectively proves the limit using variable substitution and function composition.
Hygelac
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on one complicated limits problem, wondering if any of you could help me :) usually I am pretty fine with limits but this one uses all variables and has functions in it. Anyways, here it is:

f(a) = b, g(b) = c, h(c) = d
prove lim[x->a](h°g°f)(a) = d

(° = "of")

Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lim[x->a](h(g(f(x)))) = d eh?

Well as x->a, f(x)->b
let y = f(x)
So now we have lim[y->b](h(g(y)))

as y->b, g(y)->c

Make sense? I guess the rest is obvious
 
Thanks for your help, I just thought of something else, too. Seems like this works and is very easy, could you do just a quick check of it and see if it makes sense?

f(a) = b, g(b) = c, h(c) = d

lim[x->a](h(g(f(a)))) = d

f(a) = b, so g(f(a)) = g(b)
g(b) = c, so h(g(b)) = h(c)
h(c) = d, which solves the problem
 
Looks good to me. You may want to play it safe I'm not sure how meticulous your teacher expects you to me but I would accept that answer :)
 
Thanks a bunch :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top