Proving Unitary Operators = e^iA for Self Adjoint Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter skyroot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
skyroot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove or disprove: if U is in the vector space of complex n x n matrices, then U is unitary if and only if U= e^iA, where A is some self adjoint matrix in same vector space, all of whose eigenvalues lie in the interval [0,2pi)


Homework Equations


A is self adjoint; A* = A, and A is unitarily equivalent to a diagonal matrix, A=PDP*, where P is a unitary matrix whose columns consist of eigenvectors of A which form an orthonormal basis for the vector space.
e^iA= P(a diagonal matrix with first entry, D'11= e^it1, and last entry D'nn=e^itn)P* . Where t1 thru tn
are the (real) eigenvalues of A, and P is the matrix defined above.
Unitary operators:
UU*= I , the defn of unitary
Unitary operators are normal, all eigenvalues have abs value 1, and ||Uv|| = ||v|| for any vector in the vector space U is acting on.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've proved it one of the directions, starting by assuming U=e^iA, putting it into the form i described above, and showing U*=e^-iA, simply multiplying UU* gives I, which is the defn of unitary operator. I think I need a small hint for how to approach the proof from the other direction,i.e. starting with assuming that U is unitary can one show that it equals e^iA for some self adjoint A. Questioning if only the first direction is true, and if the other direction can be proved at all. Trying to think of a counterexample. Thank you for your help.


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, i got it
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top