Proving Zwillinger's Formula #686 - Is it Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,419
Reaction score
4,228
It's formula #686 of Zwillinger's book "CRC Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae" 31-st edition, 5-th chapter.

He claims that

[tex]\int_{0}^{1} \frac{dx}{\sqrt{\ln\left(\ln\frac{1}{x}\right)}} =\sqrt{\pi}[/tex].

Is it correct...?:confused: And if so, how does one find/prove something like that...?

Daniel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That doesn't look right. As x goes from 0 to 1, ln(1/x) goes from infinity to 0, and ln(ln(1/x)) goes from infinity to -infinity, all monotonically. ln(ln(1/x))=0 at x=1/e and so the integral from 0 to 1/e is real and nonzero, while the integral from 1/e to 1 is imaginary and nonzero, so the answer should be complex.
 
Last edited:
I could do that myself as well. It looked rather odd that i couldn't find the integral in the bibliographical resources...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
It's formula #686 of Zwillinger's book "CRC Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae" 31-st edition, 5-th chapter.

He claims that

[tex]\int_{0}^{1} \frac{dx}{\sqrt{\ln\left(\ln\frac{1}{x}\right)}} =\sqrt{\pi}[/tex].

Is it correct...?:confused: And if so, how does one find/prove something like that...?

Daniel.

It seems that there are too many ln's, i.e.,

[tex] \int_{0}^{1} \frac{dx}{\sqrt{\ln\frac{1}{x}}} = \Gamma \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) =\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]