Pure inductor (only) in AC circuit

AI Thread Summary
In a pure inductor connected to a sinusoidal AC source, the induced electromotive force (emf) opposes the applied emf, leading to a unique behavior in current flow. As the AC current reverses, the inductor generates an opposing emf that acts like a resistance, known as reactance, which varies with frequency. At low frequencies, inductors allow most current to pass, while at high frequencies, they present high resistance, resembling an open circuit. The term "back emf" is debated, as it implies a voltage opposing the source, but similar behavior occurs in resistors and capacitors. Overall, inductors store energy and can produce forward emf when the voltage source is removed, complicating the understanding of their behavior in circuits.
spiky
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

suppose we have a sinusoidal AC source connected to only a pure inductor of self inductance L ( no resistance at all ) ..then emf induced in the inductor is L * dI/dt and is equal and opposite to the applied emf. but if the induced emf opposes the applied emf , then how can there be a current at all in the circuit and in the inductor ?


Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When the AC current reverses itself an emf will develop across the inductor opposing the flow. Onto the next cycle, another emf will develop impeding the flow again. So in a sense an inductor represents a sort of resistance to AC signal. We call it reactance (units in ohms), and it depends on the frequency of AC.

At low frequencies, inductors exhibit little resistance to AC and pass all current.

At high frequencies, inductors exhibit very high resistance and look like an open circuit.
 
hey, waht-

I think the term "back emf" is poor terminology, but it's standard usage. It's only used with inductors and motors, that I know of. As you say, it means an inductor develops a voltage opposite the source. But so do a resistor and capacitor.

An inductor also stores energy and is a source of emf--but so also, a capacitor.

On top of that, remove the voltage source and the inductor produces a forward emf in the sense of the source.

A motor with inertia, behaves more like a capacitor than an inductor with the removal of an emf source, so the terminology seems to have developed to put a mental picture behind this spooky magnetic stuff.
 
i think i sort of got it. . thanks.but any more illuminating explanations are welcome.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top