Q about current article: On-demand Hydrogen Generation : ACS Nano Letters

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a research abstract that mentions a process for splitting water molecules without the use of light, heat, or electricity. A key question raised is the source of energy for this reaction. It is clarified that the reaction involving silicon (Si) and water (H2O) is exothermic, producing silicon dioxide (SiO2) and hydrogen gas (H2). This exothermic nature indicates that the reaction releases energy, which is sufficient for the water splitting process. The conversation also touches on the similarity of this method to using an aluminum/gallium alloy for water splitting, emphasizing that the initial assumption of a catalytic process was incorrect.
pdxjjb
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Here is the abstract: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl304680w

I would need to pay the $35 so I have not read the full text.

Question: it says "...without Light, Heat, or Electricity." Where is the energy required to split the water molecules coming from?

Jeff
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
2H2O +Si -> SiO2 +2H2

This reaction is very exothermic due to the high energy of formation of SiO2.
 
In a way it is not much different from using Al/Ga alloy for the same purpose.
 
Thank you both. I foolishly thought they might be claiming some kind of catalysis. I saw the error of my ways soon after posting.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top