Qausi-static displacement current (Purcell)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of "quasi-static" displacement current as presented in Purcell's "Electricity and Magnetism." Specifically, it addresses the mathematical relationship where the curl of the displacement current density, Jd, is expressed as curl Jd = -(1/4πε)(∂²B/∂t²). This indicates that for slowly varying fields, curl Jd approaches zero, leading to the conclusion that the magnetic field B must also be zero. The participant seeks clarification on the reasoning behind this implication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly curl operations
  • Basic concepts of magnetic fields and their behavior in varying electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Maxwell's equations in detail, focusing on the displacement current term
  • Review vector calculus, specifically the properties and implications of the curl operator
  • Examine the relationship between electric fields and magnetic fields in electromagnetic waves
  • Explore Purcell's "Electricity and Magnetism" for deeper insights into electromagnetic theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators in electromagnetism, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of displacement current and its implications in classical electromagnetism.

shooba
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
"Qausi-static" displacement current (Purcell)

Hello all,
On page 329, chapter 9 of Purcell's E&M book, he describes why the "displacement current" produces nearly zero magnetic field for slowly varying fields. By taking the curl of the displacement current Jd, he shows that curlJd=-(1/4[itex]\pi[/itex]c)(∂2B/∂t2), so that for slowly varying fields, curlJd is nearly zero. From this, using a symmetry/superposition argument he concludes that there can be no magnetic field for such a current distribution. It is this last step that I do not understand; how does curlJd=0 imply B=0?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bump? Maybe this belongs in the classical physics section?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K