How do I treat IR divergences in e+/e- to mu+/mu- scattering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eoghan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infrared Qed
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi!

In e+/e- to mu+/mu- scattering, if the initial electron/positron radiates a photon, then I have an IR divergence. How do I treat it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually when you find an IR divergence it means that you didn't considered all the diagrams to a given order. For example, in the ee->μμ scattering you have the tree level diagram that is of order M_1=O(e^2) (where M is the related matrix element). If you want to add the diagram in which the initial electron emits a photon then you are adding a diagram of order M_2=O(e^3). Then, considering that you will have to take the square of the matrix elements your leading order will be |M_2|^2=O(e^6).
To resolve the IR divergence you have to add, for example, the diagrams in which the one of the initial (or final) particles emits and then re-absorb this photon (that is a renormalization diagram). This new diagram lead to a matrix element M_3=O(e^4) and so it could seem to be of higer order. But, since they all compete to the same phenomenon you will have to take the square of the sum of the diagrams and thus you obtain:

$$|M_1+M_2+M_3|^2=|M_1|^2+|M_2|^2+|M_3|^2+2Re(M_1^*M_2)+2Re(M_1^*M_3)+2Re(M_2^*M_3)=O(e^4)+O(e^6)+O(e^8)+O(e^5)+O(e^2)+O(e^7)$$

so, as you can see you have to include also the second mixed term in order to consider all the diagrams to the same order.

What you usually do is to give a small mass to the photon (in order to avoid divergences during calculations) and consider all these contribution. And the end of the calculation you can set the photon mass to zero.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Back
Top