Quantum QFT books in order of difficulty

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on recommendations for Quantum Field Theory (QFT) books ranked by difficulty. Participants suggest starting with Peskin for an introductory understanding, supplemented by Greiner, Srednicki, and Lahiri and Pal for a more accessible approach. Weinberg's texts are noted for their clarity but are considered advanced, while Zee's "Nutshell" is criticized for its imprecision despite covering extensive material. The consensus is that after foundational texts, Schwartz's "QFT and the Standard Model" is a suitable next step. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of choosing the right starting point based on individual learning preferences.
marcom
Messages
17
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I'd like to ask you if you could write a list of QFT books in order of increasing difficulty. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Easiest to most difficult;

1. Every book that isn't Weinberg.
2. Weinberg.

But seriously, difficulty is a relative concept. Are you talking just about intro QFT? Otherwise you could include books on N=4 SYM and curved space QFT which are obviously much more advanced than introductory topics.

For my first exposure to QFT I used Peskin. Now I'm on my second taking of QFT and I'm using Peskin as the basis supplemented with Greiner,Weinberg and Srednicki. You could start with Greiner too but I don't really like his style and only use it for a few things, such as the full proof of Noether's theorem omitted in Peskin. Srednicki is a good start too. All of these except Weinberg are roughly the same level anyway.

The book by Lahiri and Pal is probably the friendliest intro book I've come across though. It's very step by step with lots of problems.
 
Quantum Field Theory for Gifted Amateur is a very good book to start with. But you really need to read another book after that, maybe Quantum Field Theory and Standard Model by Schwartz. I think Hatfield's or Weinberg's come next. But most people here tell you that you really need to read Weinberg's so I guess you can forget about Hatfield's if you want or just use it as a supplement to Schwartz's. Anyway, I think Hatfield's is nice enough to keep it in the list.
 
The most difficult QFT textbook I've encountered so far is Zee's "nutshell". Maybe the nutshell was too small for the vast amount of material he wanted to squeeze in, but the bottom line is that it is so imprecise that it becomes difficult to understand. Weinberg's books are at a high level but very easy to understand, because everything is very carefully explained. It's of course not so good as a first encounter with the theory, for which I'd recommend

M. D. Schwartz, QFT and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press (2014)
L. H. Ryder. Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, 2 edition, 1996.

or, if you prefer a path-integral-only approach (but this done really brilliantly)

D. Bailin and A. Love. Introduction to Gauge Field Theory. Adam Hilger, Bristol and Boston, 1986.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top