QFT Lagrangian Problem: Find Free Particle Action Hermitian Way

  • Thread starter Thread starter arten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Qft
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around formulating the action of a non-relativistic spineless free particle in a manifestly hermitian way within the context of quantum field theory (QFT). Participants are exploring the requirements for a Lagrangian that leads to the Schrödinger equation while ensuring hermiticity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to derive a hermitian Lagrangian that can yield the Schrödinger equation. There are inquiries about what constitutes a "hermitian way" in this context. Some suggest specific forms for the Lagrangian and explore the implications of using independent variables for the wave function and its complex conjugate.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing their formulations and questioning the hermiticity of their proposed Lagrangians. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the Lagrangian, and there is an ongoing examination of the necessary conditions for it to be hermitian.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of ensuring the Lagrangian is hermitian while also satisfying the requirements of the Schrödinger equation. There is a focus on the relationship between the wave function and its complex conjugate, as well as the implications of the order of derivatives in the equations involved.

arten
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I've started a course on QFT and I'm having some troubles trying to find the solution of this exercise:

Write the action of a non-relativistic spineless free particle in a manifestly hermitian way

The problem should be simple but I'm a bit lost in the hermitian way part... What does it mean here ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arten said:
Hello, I've started a course on QFT and I'm having some troubles trying to find the solution of this exercise:

Write the action of a non-relativistic spineless free particle in a manifestly hermitian way

The problem should be simple but I'm a bit lost in the hermitian way part... What does it mean here ?

Thanks

I think you have to find a hermitean Lagrangian from which the Schrödinger equation can be derived:

[tex]\partial_0\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_0\psi^\ast)} + \partial_i\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_i\psi^\ast)}- \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \psi^\ast} = 0\;\;\Rightarrow\;\; i\hbar\partial_0\psi + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\partial_i^2\psi = 0[/tex]
 
I guess you are familiar with Lagrangians in field theory, e.g. electrodynamics (the problem here is simpler). You have to find a Lagrangian with

[tex]\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}[\psi,\psi^\ast, \partial_0\psi, \partial_0\psi^\ast, \partial_i\psi, \partial_i\psi^\ast][/tex]

Here ψ and ψ* are independent variables, so in principle there are two Euler-Lagrange equations, one for ψ* derived via variation w.r.t. ψ and one for ψ derived via variation w.r.t. ψ*; I wrote down the ansatz for the latter one. Of course these two equations are related via complex conjugation, so you get the Schrödinger equation and the cc Schrödinger equation.

The Schrödinger equation is of first order in the time derivative, so there can't be a square of the time derivative in the Lagrangian, you have to have something like

[tex]\psi^\ast\,\partial_0\psi[/tex]

plus cc, of course.

The Schrödinger equation is of second order in the spatial derivative, so you have to have something like[tex](\partial_i\psi^\ast)\,(\partial_i\psi)[/tex]

plus cc.

arten said:
... in a manifestly hermitian way

... I'm a bit lost in the hermitian way part... What does it mean here ?

It means that

[tex]\mathcal{L}^\ast = \mathcal{L}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
I write the lagrangian as:

L = ihψ*∂0ψ+h2/2m(∂iψ*)(∂iψ) but it's not hermitian so I rewrite as

L = ih/2[ψ*∂0ψ-ψ∂0ψ*]+h2/2m(∂iψ*)(∂iψ)

If I apply the equation to L or L* I get the schrödinger equation for ψ and ψ*

Is it correct?

Then the action is S=∫dx4L
 
Last edited:
Nearly correct; the Lagrangian isn't hermitean, so you have to add the cc of the first term
 
Now it's OK
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K